Editorial

Ethical violations and the publication of journal articles

Anak Agung Sagung Sawitri

Anak Agung Sagung Sawitri
Udayana University. Email: sawitri56@hotmail.com
Online First: December 01, 2019 | Cite this Article
Sawitri, A. 2019. Ethical violations and the publication of journal articles. Public Health and Preventive Medicine Archive 7(2): 73-74. DOI:10.15562/phpma.v7i2.230


There is a high demand for publication in the form of scientific articles in reputable journals in the academic world in Indonesia. Research publication in reputable or accredited national journals is required for graduation from tertiary institutions for master level students.Publication in reputable international journals is also a requirement for doctoral-level students graduation. For teaching staff, research publication in the form of peer reviewed journal articles is also a requirement for higher levels in the academic career. The increasing demand for scientific publication also reported globally. Furthermore, various reported reasons for publication include adding work resumes, for job promotion, obtaining funding grants, competition among colleagues or proving supremacy, and even in some universities, the history of  publications is used as the criteria for determining dissertation internal and external examiners.

References

Indonesia Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi [The Republic of Indonesia Regulations No. 12 Year 2012 on Higher Education]. 2012.

Indonesia Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education. Peraturan Menteri Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 50 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi [Internet] [The Indonesia Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education Act No. 50 Year 2018 on The Revision of The Indonesia Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education Act No. 44 Year 2015 on Higher Education National Standard]. 2018.

Indonesia Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform. Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 17 Tahun 2013 Tentang Jabatan Fungsional Dosen dan Angka Kreditnya [Internet] [The Indonesia Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform Act No. 17, Year 2013 on Functional Position of University Lecturers and The Credit Points]. 2013.

Cariappa MP, Kumar N. Predatory publishing: Writers beware! Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2015;71(3):300-301.

De U, Chowdhury SSR. Deceptive perpetrators under cover: are they on the rise. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics. 2010; 7:264.

Pillai RK, Mehendale S, Awasthi S, Ravi Varman G. The significance of research in post-graduate education and ways to facilitate. Clinical Epidemiology Global Health. 2015;3(2): 58-62.

Tandon VR, Mahajan A, Sharma S, Gupta SK. Unethical publication practices. JK Science. 2006;8(3):123-124.

Rallison SP. What are journals for? Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2015;97(2):89-91.

Ware M, Mabe M. The stm report. STM Rep [Internet]. 2009;(September):68. Available from: http://www.stm-assoc.org/2009_10_13_MWC_STM_Report.pdf.

Serebnick J. Identifying unethical practices in journal publishing. Library Trends. 1991;40(2):357-372.

Kabra SK, Werna IC. Thesis during MD: Must or bust? The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2007;74(9):868-869.

Yilmas S, Kalyoncu U, Cinar M, Karadag O, Koca SS, Simsek I, et al. Features and publication rates of scientific abstract presented at a rheumatology congress EULAR 2008. Bulletin of The Hospital for Joint Diseases. 2013;71(2):124-127.

Allart E, Beaucamp F, Tiffreau V, Thevenon A. Fate of abstracts presented at the 2008 European Congress of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2015;51(4):469–475.

Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Koroleva AM, Kitas GD. The pressure to publish more and the scope of predatory publishing activities. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2016;31(12):1874-1878.

Kaushik R. The authorship’s index – a simple way to measure an authors contribution to literature. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2013;1(1):1-3.

Zauner H, Nogoy NA, Edmunds SC, Zhou H, Goodman L. Editorial: We need to talk about authorship. Gigascience. 2018;7(12):1-4.

Vučković-Dekić L. Multiauthorship and false authorship: Why worrying about this? Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2014;142(9–10):637–640.

Wager E, Singhvi S KS. Too much of a good thing? An observational study of prolific authors. PeerJ [Internet].2015;3:e1154. Available from:https://peerj.com/articles/1154/

Claxton LD. Scientific authorship: Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research. 2005;589(1):31–45.

Gaber Y. Unethical practices in scientific research: authorship. Jordan; 2011

Hundley V, Teijlingen E, Simkhada P. Academic authorship: who, why and in what order? Health Renaissance. 2013;11(2):99–101.

Ansari M. Gifted authorship in scientific writings. Med Phoenix. 2017;1(1):1–2.

Beall J. Best practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2016;98(2):77–79.

Cariappa MP, Dalal SS, Chatterjee K. To publish and perish: A Faustian bargain or a Hobson’s choice. Medical Journal Armed Forces India [Internet]. 2016;72(2):168–171.


No Supplementary Material available for this article.
Article Views      : 168
PDF Downloads : 71